@ 2xAA Fan Speed at 100% of test 76-77% FurMark 1.22.0.0 - score ID: 215597 FurMark(donut) | OpenGL Submitted by anonymous on Nov 30, 2020 @ 00:45:23 RAM: DDR3 GSKILL Ripjaw 16383 MB Hi guys, In Furmarks I scored 3645 pts. Catalyst 13.2 I seem to have a problem (and many others too if you google), no matter how I set my clocks on my 7950, furmark runs at a constant 32fps and gives ~1900. 63Deg C. The windowed runs use a slightly smaller than 1920x1080 resolution and allows for slightly higher FPS values) 13190 frames, 14 FPS Who’s laughing now. Hope this helps in some way. AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970 1280×720 on GTX 670, Max GPU Temp: 69°C Memory Clock—- 1375(MHz) 3900 MHz/16337 MB Windows 7 64-bit build 760 FurMark GpuTest Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4460 3.2GHz GeForce GTX 1070 Asus ROG Strix Gaming OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by marky117 at 15:32 Jul-12 … Score 264. temps seem to be really good and runs WoW very smooth. Ambient temp is... warmer to say the least (probably around 72F so about 22C), 4 Intake fans at the front (Corsair SP120, 2 synced through speedfan to GPU temp, 2 at full speed via fan controller). Three kind of scores are available on these charts: Settings: Preset:1080 (1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode). I'd save the money and just overclock your processor. score: 940 points, temp: 65 celcius, Max GPU Temp: 70°C using msi afterburner. , 6569 points (72 FPS) with two MSI GTX 670’s. FPS: min:29, max:32, avg:30 – OPTIONS: DynBkg galaxy geforce gt610 2gb, Temp at 50% 64c How come 5+3/2=2 eh? ... Snaike my furmark score is 5895 I looked at your post yours went from 2852 to a score of 6008. Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1004 Renderer: Geforce x2 sli GTX670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). 34°C AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} CPU: 3013 MHz – GeForce GTX TITAN I haven't cranked up the memory clock very far as i'm new to OC'ing, using MSI Afterburner. Welcome to the Geekbench CUDA Benchmark Chart. GPU core: 1380MHz 1GB Asus GTX 560 Ti DCU2*TOP* 4789 points (79 FPS, 60000 ms)with two EVGA GTX 460’s. 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Ive never topped any table tis a crying shame lol sort it out please. – GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 980 Ti Furmark screenshot at the end of 1 hour 12 minutes along with the custom fan curve are posted in this imgur album. Frames 2250 Tested more than twice. Max GPU Temp: 0°C and i forgot to mention this but the resolution was 1024*768 at 720p. AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ Разрешение: 1920 х 1080 crap monitor x.x) You can either exempt “fullscreen” in this case or provide a reconsidered base-line for 16:9. Resolution: 1920 x 1080 The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is the second fastest Pascal based graphics card in November 2017. – added Preset:2160 scores. – added GTX 1080 2-way SLI P1080 score. 1080p, 8xMSAA, Fullscreen, dynamic background, Burn-in. I get a failure when I try to Submit results. resolution:1920×1080 Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 Service Pack 1. 8gb Corsair Vengance 1600mhz GPU core: 1280 MHz, memory: 3121 MHz Update drivers etc too. Resolution: 1920×1080 (W) – AA:8 samples GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1004 – Max GPU temp: 65 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz , Asus AMD Radeon HD6870 It strives for the excellence in power, speed, cooling, noise, gaming, and size with no compromise on performance. Windows XP 32 Bit Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.90GHz 1830 MHz/1535 MB GPU core: 1050 MHz, memory: 1425 MHz Catalyst 13.1 Intel Core i7 2700K OEM UNLOCK To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. GPU temperatures (start/end): 44°C / 71°C, Number of GPUs: 1 The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. 46093 frames, 51 FPS, 76°C Surely it should be around 30fps, like the 5850. Max GPU Temp: 80°C Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 I understand you’ve chosen 2x 16:9 (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) where baseline is set at 1280×720 but the condition of “full-screen” isn’t applicable for the aforesaid mainstream 16:9 monitors (1366×768) as it simply wont switch (tested). Is that bad if so what could be causing this? FPS: min:1, max:3, avg:0 – OPTIONS: DynBkg The 1070 I received had all ports covered by plastic caps. Here's the excel doc. AMD FX(tm)-8150 Eight-Core Processor Preset:1080 My goodness, how in the world did I completely miss this post? Might help. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples bench duration:15min MSI’s GTX 1050 Ti comes with three modes for the GPU clock speeds: Silent mode (base: 1290MHz, boost: 1392MHz), Gaming mode (base: 1303MHz, boost: 1417MHz) and OC mode(base: 1316MHz, boost: 1430MHz). If you have overclocked, scale it back a little. AMD Athlon II X4 630 2.8ghz Preset:1080 I have a Phantom 410 with 1 stock intake and 1 Premium intake both 120mm, 1 120mm stock exhaust at the rear and a 140mm prem and 120mm prem exhaust at the top through a corsair H100 Radiator. Nvidia geforce GTX 550 ti SCORE: 5627 points (93 FPS), Submitted by Kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:14 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds Though later would have unfairly greater burn-in stress-level compared to former one, exclusively in case of Intel HD IGP’s. can anyone comment on this regarding the above observed data. This ensures that all modern games will run on GeForce GTX 1070. Catalyst 10.2 – 8.593.100-100210a-095952E-ATI (2-10-2010) The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. CPU speed: 3400 MHz is that right? FPS: min:92, max:112, avg:102 Settings: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. @ 1920×1080 radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit

The most advanced gaming GPU ever created. I got 3515 points with my HD5970… Higher than the HD7970! Pretty much okay considering the processor I have, good temps too :3, (Tested) Unigine Heaven 2.0 Direct3D 11 Scores, GpuTest 0.2.0: Cross Platform OpenGL Benchmark, FurMark Lands on Linux and OS X, AMD FirePro W9100 OpenGL 4 FP32 and FP64 Scores (Julia Fractal), (TessMark) OpenGL 4 Tessellation Benchmark: Comparative Table, Demoscene: Source Code of Farbrausch’s Demo Tools 2001-2011 Available, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78098, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=78113, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494, NVIDIA GeForce 457.67 win10 x64 (Vulkan 1.2.164), AMD Radeon Adrenalin 2020 (20.12.1) win10 x64, AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 20.12.2, NVIDIA GeForce Hotfix display driver 460.97, NVIDIA Vulkan 1.2.164 developer driver 457.67, NVIDIA GeForce 460.27.04 for AArch64, Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris, Raytraced Shadows in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, Microsoft's Creepy New Productivity Score Gamifies Workplace Surveillance, AMD RDNA 2: Hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing in Radeon ProRender 2.0, AMD RDNA 2 Hangar 21 Technology Demo Video (DX12 Raytracing), GeeXLab 0.39 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.38.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.37.0 Released (Windows, Linux, Raspberry Pi and macOS), GeeXLab 0.36.0 released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, (Game) Imbricker 0.3.0 Released for Windows, Linux and Raspberry Pi, How to Install NVIDIA Graphics Drivers on Linux Mint 17, Electronics: blinking LED with Raspberry Pi GPIO and GeeXLab, AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce FP32/FP64 GFLOPS Table. Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples Overclock it? Almost all existing graphics cards can be benchmarked with FurMark: GeForce 6 / 7/ 8 / 9 / GTX200 / GTX400 / GTX500 / GTX600, Radeon X1900 / HD2000 / HD3000 / HD4000 / HD5000 / HD6000 / HD7000, Intel HD Graphics 2000 / 3000 / 4000. Video Card: Asus - GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB ROG STRIX Video Card ($469.99 @ Newegg) ... been having the same problems since installing geforce experience and just found a solution that turned my furmark score from 3407 to 5789 go to nvidia control panel manage 3d settings 700W FSP Aurum PSU GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 77°C, Number of GPUs: 1 i got a 413 score for ati mobility radeon 550v. Clocks: GPU core: 1188 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz Graphics drivers: 9.18.13.2018 5-12-2013 – GLnvoglv64 Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 67848 frames, 83 FPS, 79°C Hope that fits the bill until I can get a bigger better card for this new 27-inch Asus steroescopic 3D monitor. Timespy: 6630 overall, 7299 Graphics score, Firestrike: 16204 overall, 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 MSAA samples: 0 I am registered. Operating system: Windows 8 64-bit build 9200 No Service Pack. I was able to crack 17k on the overall score with a 1070, but I'm using an X58 system that's about 6 years old. MSI GTX 660TI PE with a small OC Renderer AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Peak temp: 94°C In few moments I hope, the HD 7970 will be benchmarked. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is ~19% faster than RTX 3080 The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 20387 ‘graphics’ points in Time Spy 1440p preset. GPU temperatures (start/end): 37°C / 65°C, Number of GPUs: 1 OS:Windows 7 64-bit, 2690 frames, 44 FPS, 81°C GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3445 MHz festplatte 1 x ssd samsung 130gb I cant test under 1080. system memory: 8Gb DDR2 (PC2-6400) GTX 1070 Ti Furmark Test w/ Custom Fan Curve. MSAA samples: 0 @Sandy Instability can be because of OC going to far or an insufficient power supply. GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz Everything set to max for the 15-minute burn. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2700K CPU @ 3.50GHz How am I averaging 47 fps on a regular 1070 versus your 42 on the Ti with the same settings? Need MORE POWER , MSI Radeon 7750 Stock cooling Is it about what I should be expecting though? GPU core: 775 MHz, memory: 1000 MHz first was on saved profile 4 and cant remember if it was set to my current res of 1920×1080. OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601[Service Pack 1]. While an overclocked 6970 will still smash my 6950, I’m VERY happy with 31FPS on the 1080 test…! I'd be interested in others thoughts (other than "you should have bought a 1080). AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series (1002-6798) No AA this time With PowerTune set to +20%, the HD 6970 CF gets around 4700 points. I would have thought the Ti was faster than that. Score 2231 for the crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards. Benchmark Preset Score GPU When; FurMark(donut) | OpenGL: P1080: 4254: Radeon RX 570 Series Catalyst – 8.723.8.2-100920a-105610C-Sony (9-20-2010) GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz, Is that about right?? I ran the test @ 1280×720, following your criteria, with exception being windowed and not full-screen as crap 19-inch “HD-LED” wont switch to full at that resolution. Graphics drivers: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 22704 frames, 25 FPS, 70’C Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz Max GPU Temp: 80°C GPU core: 1005 MHz, memory: 3105 MHz lately i have been experiencing autoshutdown problems while playing games. Average 36fps. MSAA samples: 0 1090t 6 core processor 8 gigs ram. I swear I literally stared at the average the whole 60 seconds (plus warm-up) throughout 120+ frames. 59Deg C. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors.