But unfortunately for the AMD cards, the cheaper Palit GeForce GTX 970 JetStream (S$479) edged ahead in all our tests but one. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Grenada graphics processor, in its Grenada PRO variant, the card supports DirectX 12. This review of AMD's Radeon R9 390X benchmarks the MSI “Gaming” brand of the card, measuring FPS in the Witcher 3 & more, alongside power and thermal metrics. At least in Shadow of Mordor, AMD’s strategy to boost high-resolution gaming performance by increasing memory bandwidth appears to have paid off. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). The GPU is still built on the same 28 nm process that you’d have found in the previous generation. All Rights Reserved. All three AMD cards were relatively closely matched in Thief. Benchmark results, said to include the rumoured upcoming AMD Radeon R9 390X, have been uploaded to Chinese tech forum ChipHell.If these … Unfortunately, we don’t have an R9 290 card with us at this time, so we’re unable to add it to our comparisons. This resulted in just under a 6% gain in 3DMark 2013. AMD’s overclocking performance was actually more or less on par with the GeForce GTX 970, which posted around a 6% gain when overclocked. Moving on to more demanding resolutions and settings, we’re really seeing a repeat of what we saw with the Fury X. AMD’s 390 series of cards also need memory-hungry applications to do well, and the company is probably right in framing high-resolution gaming performance as one of the card’s advantages. If you need options for console gaming, BenQ’s got them in spades! Radeon Software Installer 4: New user interface and intuitive Radeon Software Installer that includes options for express install, custom install and clean uninstall. I see that these cards have just been appended to the old R9 290 & 290x benchmarks. To help quantify things, the R9 390X was almost 11% faster than the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 G1 Gaming at a resolution of 2,560 x 1,600 pixels. This ultimately isn’t a very impressive overclock, and it translated into an approximately 4% increase in all three 3DMark tests. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). The new AMD R9 390 is the direct successor to the R9 290. Mining benchmark & gpu compare for , beamhashII, bitcore, cnr, cuckaroo_swap, cuckatoo31, ethash, kawpow, mtp, x16r, x16rv2, x21s crypto algos | AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390 | Sort: -power MinerMonitoring complete Windows/Linux mining monitoring and controlling software with iOS/Android applications We thank all our supporters who have helped us garner these prestigious media awards in the industry! When moving up to the more demanding Fire Strike Extreme (running at 2,560 x 1,440 pixels resolution) and Ultra (3,840 x 2,160 pixels resolution) tests, the performance difference between the GeForce GTX 980 and the Radeon R9 390X widened to around 14%. Copyright Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. Reg. The Radeon R9 390 has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R9 380. Subscribe to the latest tech news as well as exciting promotions from us and our partners! What is the difference between Nvidia Titan X and AMD Radeon R9 390? The 390X has a slightly increased GPU clock speed, a significantly increased memory speed and a higher minimum VRAM of 8GB but it shares the same core GPU hardware. At the most demanding resolution of 2,560 x 1,600 pixels and Very High settings, the Radeon R9 390 series cards look like they finally managed to get ahead of the Palit GeForce GTX 970 thanks to their excess memory bandwidth. The authoritative voice on technology trends, gadget shootouts, and geeky life hacks you never knew you could live without. The Radeon R9 390 also turned out to be more or less on par with the Radeon R9 290X, so AMD has at least succeeded in bringing what was previously its enthusiast-level performance to a card priced more for the mainstream. The number of stream processors also remains unchanged from the 290 series, with the R9 390X featuring 2816 stream processors and the R9 390 a more modest 2560. ... you shouldn't have THAT much difficulty differentiating between the new Radeon cards. Additionally the R9 390 sports a minimum of 8GB of VRAM versus 4GB on the R9 … It’s really testament to the strength of NVIDIA’s second-generation Maxwell cards that the GeForce GTX 970 can continue to remain competitive against AMD’s latest gambit. Second-generation Maxwell also continues to shine in to power consumption department, and both NVIDIA cards rounded up the bottom of the charts in our power consumption test. Here are the specifications of our graphics testbed: In order to see where the Radeon R9 390X and 390 stand, we’ve decided to pit it against the Radeon R9 290X, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 and 970. All R9 390xs will have 8gb memory, as will the R9 390s. with 3DMark, the Gamer's Benchmark. AMD Radeon R9 390 Both the R9 390X and R9 390 perform well here, with the 390X beating all the other cards at all our tested resolutions. 15.06 GPixel/s higher pixel rate? There were just a few frames of difference across all the cards at all our tested settings, a relatively minuscule difference that gamers would be hard-pressed to notice in-game. However, the GeForce GTX 980’s overclocking capabilities proved unrivalled here, and it powered ahead to an approximately 10% increase in performance. AMD R9 390 & 390x benchmarks? The GeForce GTX 980 card came in first in all our tested settings. Level up and earn rewards with the new Demon Avenger in MapleStoryM! The R9 390X, on the other hand, is starts at US $429, and offers performance … Unified cross-platform 3D graphics benchmark database AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390 Series performance in GFXBench - unified graphics benchmark based on DXBenchmark (DirectX) and … The R9 390 has a 5% higher stock GPU clock, and a substantial stock memory clock increase of 20%. In fact, power consumption increased over the Radeon R9 290X, so AMD clearly wasn’t talking about overall power consumption figures when it mentioned improvements to power efficiency. The Radeon R9 390 also turned out to be more or less on par with the Radeon R9 290X, so AMD has at least succeeded in bringing what was previously its enthusiast-level performance to a card priced more for the mainstream. Added support for AMD Radeon R9 Fury series, R9 390 series, R9 380 series, R9 290 series, R9 285, R9 260 series, R7 360, and R7 260 desktop graphics products. The GeForce GTX 980 raced ahead at the resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 pixels with anti-aliasing turned off. The R9 390X posted the highest peak power consumption – 417 watts – in 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme. The Radeon R9 390 also turned out to be more or less on par with the Radeon R9 290X, so AMD has at least succeeded in bringing what was previously its enthusiast-level performance to a card priced more for the mainstream. 64.6 GPixel/s vs 49.54 GPixel/s No 198402868E. The less powerful PowerColor PCS+ Radeon R9 390 ran cooler at 65℃, probably owing to its lower clock speeds and pared-down Hawaii core. AMD Radeon R9 390 Vendor Micro-Star International Co ., Ltd. # of cards 1 SLI / CrossFire Off Memory 8,192 MB Clock frequency 1,040 MHz (0 MHz) Average clock frequency N/A Memory clock frequency 1,500 MHz (0 MHz) Average memory clock frequency N/A Average temperature N/A Driver version 15.150.1004.0 Driver status Not Approved Find out more at UL.com. We … Christmas shopping up to 80% off. AMD Radeon R9 390 Buy one now: http://amzn.to/1Tgj7Un Support us by becoming a Patron! UL and the UL logo are trademarks of UL LLC © 2020 All Rights Reserved. AMD Radeon R9 M390. In turn, the Radeon R9 390X was on average around 8% faster than the R9 290X, a modest gain that’s to be expected given that there have been no fundamental changes save for a few tweaks and speed boosts here and there. It was also here that the R9 390X came within a few frames of the GeForce GTX 980’s performance. The AMD Radeon R9 M390 is a mobile graphics card from 2015 and positioned as a fast mid-range GPU. This chart compares the Below is a full list of the cards and their driver versions: Do note that we’ve updated our system with the new AMD Catalyst 15.7 drivers, which finally unite the Radeon R9 300 and 200 series under the same driver build. To enjoy benefits of Warranty, Rescue, Promotion and Support. You can reach out to them here. This results in the Radeon R9 390 providing 51.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. The gap does close a fair bit at higher resolutions and with 8x MSAA turned on, likely owing to the generous amount of memory bandwidth available to the 390 series cards. AMD has kept the wraps on this one tight, however a document shows that the Tonga based Radeon R9 285 will be released onb the 2nd September, 2014. Catalyst 15.7 also reportedly offers performance improvements in Tomb Raider, so these results should show the latest performance figures at the time of writing. In Crysis 3, things return to what we observed in 3DMark 2013. As for the Radeon R9 390, we managed to achieve an 80MHz overclock to 1090MHz core clock and 6400MHz effective memory clock. Radeon R9 390 is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2560x1440. It’s again worth noting that the R9 390 and R9 290X were still neck-and-neck, and the R9 390 is certainly shaping up as the card to force the 290X into retirement. The R9 390 was again nearly indistinguishable from the R9 290X, and both cards trailed the GeForce GTX 970 by a small margin. Why is Sapphire Nitro Radeon R9 390 better than AMD Radeon RX 590? The smaller the overlap between the … Device: 1002 67B0 Models: AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390X, ASUS R9 390X, AMD Radeon (TM) R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 300 The AMD R9 390X is a rebadged power hungry (350W+) 290X. Find out how your PC compares with the We ran the game on Ultra settings (the highest available) with HD Textures enabled, setting it up to devour quite a bit of video memory. Our temperature tests are conducted by looping 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme for 15 minutes and then checking the highest recorded temperature. The AMD Radeon R9 390X is a high end desktop graphics card that was announced in summer 2015. At 224GB/s, the memory bandwidth of the GeForce GTX 980 is actually quite lacking compared to the 384GB/s available to the 390 series cards. Have feedback on the article for the editorial team? When it came to power consumption, the AMD cards showed why the Radeon R9 290 series cards have received so much criticism for their power management and efficiency. Hardwarezone.com.sg is part of the SPH Magazines Men's Network, Page 1 of 4 - Introduction: A Familiar Architecture, Page 2 of 4 - A Closer Look: MSI Radeon R9 390X Gaming 8G and PowerColor PCS+ R9 390, ASUS X99-Deluxe (Intel X99 chipset) motherboard, 4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDRR-2133 (Auto timings: CAS 15-15-15-36), Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB (Benchmarks + Games), MSI Radeon R9 390X Gaming 8G (AMD Catalyst 15.7), PowerColor PCS+ R9 390 (AMD Catalyst 15.7), ASUS Radeon R9 290X DirectCU II (AMD Catalyst 15.7), Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 G1 Gaming (ForceWare 353.30), Palit GeForce GTX 970 JetStream (ForceWare 353.30). The R9 390 also fared well against the GeForce GTX 970, where it was 19% faster than the latter card when testing at 2560 x 1600. Both cards share the same GPU but the R9 390 is factory overclocked. The Radeon R9 390 also turned out to be more or less on par with the Radeon R9 290X, so AMD has at least succeeded in bringing what was previously its enthusiast-level performance to a card priced more for the mainstream. The Fury X and the 390 series cards both have the luxury of memory bandwidth – even if they utilize different memory architectures – and it looks like Tomb Raider simply isn’t demanding enough to bring out the best in them. On the other hand, the PowerColor PCS+ Radeon R9 390 just managed to edge out its direct competitor, the GeForce GTX 970, by less than 1%. It should be based on the the old Pitcairn chip (e.g. AMD wrapped up today's GPU launch marathon, with the Radeon R9 390 series; which includes the R9 390, and the R9 390X. The Radeon R9 390 is priced at US $329, and offers performance competitive to the GeForce GTX 970. Nevertheless, the increase is to be expected given the increase in core and memory clocks, and we’d be surprised if AMD actually managed to bring the overall figure down. At a resolution of 2,560 x 1,600 pixels and above or with 8x AA enabled, the 390 series cards inched their way to near the top of the benchmarks, trailing only the more expensive GeForce GTX 980 by a small margin. This chart compares the AMD Radeon R9 390 with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. The Radeon R9 390X has 11 CUs enabled per Shader Engine, for a total of 44.On the other hand, the R9 390 retains the four Shader Engines but has just 40 CUs because one is disabled in each Shader Engine.. The Radeon 390 features 2560 Shaders, 64 ROPS and 160 TMU’s, meaning there’s certainly plenty of shader power to be had. This reminds us of what we observed in our review of the Fury X, where the most memory-hungry scenarios were required to help it close the gap with NVIDIA’s flagship cards. Nevertheless, these are just synthetic benchmarks, and we’ll refrain from jumping to any hasty conclusions that AMD is failing to live up to its claims of performance at high resolutions. Make a wish and stand to win prizes, 4 ASUS notebooks that will meet the demands of any ultraportable buyer. The Radeon R9 390 is a performance-segment graphics card by AMD, launched in June 2015. Even factoring in overclocking, the R9 390 … Find out which is better and their overall performance in the graphics card ranking. AMD Radeon R9 390X. We’ve also compiled a table to show how the cards stack up against one another on paper: The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 G1 Gaming topped the charts here, coming in at just over 8% faster than the MSI Radeon R9 390X Gaming 8G in Fire Strike. This review will be focused on the R9 390 8GB, which AMD are targeting to the 1440P crowd. MSI Radeon R9 390 DirectX 12 R9 390 GAMING 8G 8GB 512-Bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video Card. Core Clock: 1060 MHz (OC Mode) 1040 MHz (Gaming Mode) 1000 MHz (Silent Mode) Max Resolution: 4096 x 2160 DisplayPort: 1 x DisplayPort 1.2 DVI: 2 x DL-DVI-D Model #: R9 390 GAMING 8G Return Policy: View Return Policy The same story repeats itself in Tomb Raider, but with one key difference – the R9 390X actually loses out to the GeForce GTX 970 at both tested resolutions. |. Following our initial review of AMD's new R9 390 and R9 380 video cards, we took the final opportunity prior to loaner returns to overclock the devices. UL is a global safety science company that focuses on safety testing, inspection and verification services. Happily enough for AMD, there is a positive turnaround in Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor. As per our practice when doing initial reviews of new cards, we’ll be putting both cards through our full suite of synthetic and real-world gaming benchmarks: For our temperature and power consumption tests, we used the Fire Strike Extreme benchmark in 3DMark 2013. The 8GB of GDDR5 memory, higher memory clock speeds, and the 384GB/s of memory bandwidth is clearly coming in handy here. AMD Radeon R9 390 Vendor Tul Corporation # of cards 1 SLI / CrossFire Off Memory 8,192 MB Clock frequency 1,010 MHz (0 MHz) Average clock frequency N/A Memory clock frequency 1,500 MHz (0 MHz) Average memory clock frequency N/A Average temperature N/A … The difference was most pronounced at a resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 pixels with anti-aliasing turned off, where the NVIDIA card was just under 14% faster than the R9 390X. The R9 290X and GeForce GTX 980 are obvious competitors to the R9 390X, while the GeForce GTX 970 will go up against the R9 390. The R9 390 performs like a champ in Far Cry Primal, leaving the RX 480 behind and comfortably beating the GTX 970. We managed to overclock the Radeon R9 390X to a core clock of 1130MHz and an effective memory clock of 6480MHz, representing just a 5% and 8% increase over stock speeds respectively. By subscribing, you indicate that you have read & understood the SPH's, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 review: Say hello to 4K ray traced gaming, Epic Games is celebrating the holidays with 15 free titles starting from Dec 17, The ASUS ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 (GX550) is an eye-popping beast in every sense, Website/App of the Year for Consumer Tech Enthusiasts, Best Engagement Strategy by a Media Owner: Loyalty & Engagement Awards 2018. The MSI Radeon R9 390X Gaming 8G and the ASUS Radeon R9 290X DCUII recorded the same peak temperature of 73℃, an unsurprising result given that they both use the same Hawaii GPU architecture. The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. This is a marginally better performance as compared to the R9 290X, but ultimately, overclocking headroom isn’t something that AMD has managed to bring significant improvements on. 06-30-2015, 05:58 PM. with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days.